PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than ILCB's 7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 13.72%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
0.44%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.18%
6M
8.99%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
13.72%

ILCB

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
7.97%
6M
6.72%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
10.18%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
7.97%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and ILCB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and ILCB has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
ILCB

Technology

22.0%
38.9%

Financial Services

20.6%
11.4%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
4.5%

Industrials

10.4%
8.4%

Utilities

6.4%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
9.3%

Energy

5.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

DGRO
22.0%
ILCB
38.9%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.6%
ILCB
11.4%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.5%
ILCB
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.1%
ILCB
4.5%

Industrials

DGRO
10.4%
ILCB
8.4%

Utilities

DGRO
6.4%
ILCB
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.4%
ILCB
9.3%

Energy

DGRO
5.1%
ILCB
3.1%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.4%
ILCB
1.8%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
ILCB
9.9%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

ILCB
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.29

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

10.00

+3.20

DGRO vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-51.53%

+16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.09%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-19.05%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-25.47%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-35.30%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.48%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-6.22%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.08%

-0.41%

Volatility

DGRO vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.48%, while iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

4.76%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

9.94%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

12.59%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

17.22%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

18.18%

-1.60%

DGRO vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than ILCB's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.95%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and ILCB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCB has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to DGRO (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 14.94% vs 13.72% for DGRO. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 14.94% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.00% for ILCB.

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.03% for ILCB.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer