PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. FSTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than FSTA's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 13.52%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
0.69%
1M
3.48%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.27%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.52%

FSTA

1D
0.69%
1M
0.50%
YTD
10.62%
6M
8.66%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.86%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
10.62%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and FSTA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and FSTA has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
FSTA

Technology

22.0%

-

Financial Services

20.6%

-

Healthcare

16.5%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
97.6%

Industrials

10.4%
0.3%

Utilities

6.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
1.7%

Energy

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

2.4%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DGRO
22.0%
FSTA

-

Financial Services

DGRO
20.6%
FSTA

-

Healthcare

DGRO
16.5%
FSTA
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.1%
FSTA
97.6%

Industrials

DGRO
10.4%
FSTA
0.3%

Utilities

DGRO
6.4%
FSTA

-

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.4%
FSTA
1.7%

Energy

DGRO
5.1%
FSTA

-

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.4%
FSTA
0.3%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
FSTA

-

Real Estate

DGRO

-

FSTA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROFSTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.10

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

0.78

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

1.56

+11.80

DGRO vs. FSTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the FSTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and FSTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FSTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROFSTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-25.13%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.29%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-11.76%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-16.58%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-25.13%

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.38%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-3.56%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.62%

-2.94%

Volatility

DGRO vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROFSTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

4.62%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

10.03%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

12.58%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

13.15%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

14.57%

+2.05%

DGRO vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DGRO and FSTA have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FSTA's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.15%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and FSTA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs FSTA's -25.13%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.52% vs 8.01% for FSTA. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO and FSTA have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FSTA is Consumer Staples Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and FSTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer