DGIN vs. FLTR
DGIN (VanEck Digital India ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MVIS Digital India, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGIN returned 5.46%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGIN charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
DGIN vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGIN achieves a -13.97% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return.
DGIN
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -13.97%
- 6M
- -16.67%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
DGIN vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF | -13.97% | -6.00% | 22.56% | 30.30% | -22.40% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGIN and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between DGIN and FLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGIN vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
DGIN
FLTR
DGIN vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 3.03 | -2.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 16.82 | -17.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 98.58 | -99.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGIN vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGIN drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIN and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -17.84% | -15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.49% | -0.31% | -30.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -1.93% | -31.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.92% | -0.00% | -22.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.42% | -0.67% | -12.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | 0.05% | +14.70% |
Volatility
DGIN vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that DGIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 0.29% | +5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 0.66% | +15.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.81% | 0.80% | +18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 2.13% | +16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 5.00% | +13.94% |
DGIN vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGIN vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
DGIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF | 2.21% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGIN and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGIN has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIN dropped -33.65% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 3-year performance, FLTR leads with 6.16% vs 5.46% for DGIN. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for DGIN.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.21% for DGIN.
DGIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. DGIN tracks MVIS Digital India, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for DGIN and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGIN and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer