DGIN vs. FLIN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGIN (VanEck Digital India ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - DGIN tracks the MVIS Digital India while FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGIN returned 4.25%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for FLIN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGIN charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.

Performance

DGIN vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGIN achieves a -17.44% return, which is significantly lower than FLIN's -11.92% return.

DGIN

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: -17.44%
• 6M: -17.76%
• 1Y: -17.63%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLIN

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: -11.92%
• 6M: -10.85%
• 1Y: -11.63%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIN vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF	-17.44%	-6.00%	22.56%	30.30%	-21.84%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-11.92%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIN and FLIN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.84

The correlation between DGIN and FLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGIN vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGIN	FLIN
Communication Services	29.9%	4.6%
Technology	23.0%	8.4%
Financial Services	21.1%	27.2%
Consumer Cyclical	16.8%	12.0%
Energy	7.9%	9.5%
Industrials	1.4%	10.3%
Healthcare	0.9%	6.5%
Basic Materials	-	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Real Estate	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

DGIN vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIN

DGIN Risk / Return Rank: 2
DGIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DGIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DGIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DGIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
DGIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 2
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIN vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGIN	FLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	-0.78	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	-1.06	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.88	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	-0.62	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.54	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGIN vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is comparable to the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIN and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGIN	FLIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	-0.78	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.26	-0.30

Drawdowns

DGIN vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIN drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIN and FLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGIN	FLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-41.90%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.49%	-18.79%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.65%	-22.85%	-10.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.03%	-18.91%	-7.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-8.01%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.94%	7.57%	+6.37%

Volatility

DGIN vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.21%. This indicates that DGIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGIN	FLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	5.21%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	12.81%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	14.92%	+3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	15.74%	+3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	20.45%	-1.56%

DGIN vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGIN vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

DGIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF	2.30%	1.90%	0.00%	0.24%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.64%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGIN and FLIN in my portfolio?

DGIN and FLIN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGIN or FLIN?

DGIN has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIN dropped -33.65% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

Which ETF is better, DGIN or FLIN?

On 3-year performance, FLIN leads with 5.53% vs 4.25% for DGIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGIN or FLIN?

Over the 3-year period, FLIN has performed better with a 5.53% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGIN or FLIN?

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for DGIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGIN or FLIN?

DGIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.

What is the main difference between DGIN and FLIN?

DGIN tracks MVIS Digital India, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for DGIN and 0.19% for FLIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.