PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSI vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSI vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.


DFSI

1D
-0.92%
1M
2.26%
YTD
5.54%
6M
8.46%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSI vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
5.54%33.62%4.98%17.86%11.99%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and EFAV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.84

The correlation between DFSI and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSI vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSI
EFAV

Industrials

27.9%
15.1%

Financial Services

27.7%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
11.5%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.6%

Healthcare

3.7%
12.4%

Real Estate

3.4%
2.9%

Technology

3.0%
4.5%

Communication Services

1.8%
9.7%

Utilities

1.7%
9.1%

Energy

1.3%
8.2%

Industrials

DFSI
27.9%
EFAV
15.1%

Financial Services

DFSI
27.7%
EFAV
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSI
14.2%
EFAV
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFSI
8.1%
EFAV
11.5%

Basic Materials

DFSI
7.4%
EFAV
1.6%

Healthcare

DFSI
3.7%
EFAV
12.4%

Real Estate

DFSI
3.4%
EFAV
2.9%

Technology

DFSI
3.0%
EFAV
4.5%

Communication Services

DFSI
1.8%
EFAV
9.7%

Utilities

DFSI
1.7%
EFAV
9.1%

Energy

DFSI
1.3%
EFAV
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSI vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSI
DFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSI vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSIEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.46

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

4.10

+1.84

DFSI vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSIEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.92

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.53

+0.83

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSIEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-27.56%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-6.46%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.82%

-8.75%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-5.61%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-4.77%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.30%

+0.92%

Volatility

DFSI vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that DFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSIEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.17%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

8.17%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

10.35%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

11.79%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

13.21%

+2.03%

DFSI vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSI vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.14%2.23%2.39%2.10%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSI and EFAV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSI has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 3-year performance, DFSI leads with 16.80% vs 12.87% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFSI has performed better with a 16.80% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSI.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.14% for DFSI.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.20% for EFAV.

DFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSI and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer