PortfoliosLab logo
DFSI vs. FEDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and FEDM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DFSI vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFSI:

1.08

FEDM:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

DFSI:

1.48

FEDM:

1.08

Omega Ratio

DFSI:

1.21

FEDM:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

DFSI:

1.34

FEDM:

0.80

Martin Ratio

DFSI:

3.98

FEDM:

2.26

Ulcer Index

DFSI:

4.24%

FEDM:

5.07%

Daily Std Dev

DFSI:

16.58%

FEDM:

16.85%

Max Drawdown

DFSI:

-12.82%

FEDM:

-29.37%

Current Drawdown

DFSI:

-0.31%

FEDM:

-0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 15.28% return.


DFSI

YTD

18.16%

1M

5.50%

6M

14.82%

1Y

17.70%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FEDM

YTD

15.28%

1M

4.66%

6M

11.45%

1Y

12.32%

3Y*

9.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFSI vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFSI vs. FEDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFSI is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFSI is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFSI is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEDM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEDM is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEDM is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEDM is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFSI vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and FEDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DFSI vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FEDM's 2.61% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.16%2.39%2.10%0.18%0.00%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.61%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum FEDM drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and FEDM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DFSI vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) is 2.93%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that DFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...