DFSB vs. NXUS
DFSB (Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF) and NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. DFSB is actively managed, while NXUS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSB charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NXUS.
Performance
DFSB vs. NXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than NXUS's 1.19% return.
DFSB
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSB vs. NXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF | 0.68% | 0.37% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.19% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSB and NXUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSB vs. NXUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFSB
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFSB vs. NXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSB vs. NXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than NXUS's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and NXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -2.81% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.63% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -0.91% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | — | — |
Volatility
DFSB vs. NXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 3.73% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 3.73% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 3.73% | +1.73% |
DFSB vs. NXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than NXUS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSB vs. NXUS - Dividend Comparison
DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than NXUS's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF | 3.62% | 3.46% | 4.35% | 5.27% | 0.41% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.66% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSB and NXUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSB.
DFSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.66% for NXUS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.08% for NXUS.
Find the right allocation for DFSB and NXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer