NXUS vs. IAGG
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and IAGG (iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - NXUS tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged) while IAGG tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IAGG.
Performance
NXUS vs. IAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than IAGG's 0.86% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAGG
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
NXUS vs. IAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.48% | 0.61% |
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.86% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and IAGG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. IAGG — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
IAGG
NXUS vs. IAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXUS | IAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. IAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum IAGG drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and IAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | IAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -13.88% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.04% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -2.85% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. IAGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | IAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 2.84% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 4.51% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 4.05% | -0.32% |
NXUS vs. IAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IAGG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NXUS vs. IAGG - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than IAGG's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.66% | 3.08% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.27% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and IAGG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAGG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAGG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for NXUS.
IAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.67% for NXUS.
NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while IAGG tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.07% for IAGG.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and IAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer