PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSB vs. JSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSB vs. JSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than JSI's 0.86% return.


DFSB

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.68%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*

JSI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.04%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. JSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
0.68%5.22%2.45%6.35%
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
0.86%6.46%7.27%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and JSI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.68

The correlation between DFSB and JSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSB vs. JSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB
DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

JSI
JSI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. JSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSBJSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.24

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

7.15

-3.79

DFSB vs. JSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the JSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and JSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. JSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than JSI's maximum drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and JSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSBJSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-2.31%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-1.68%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.58%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-0.34%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.53%

+0.47%

Volatility

DFSB vs. JSI - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) at 0.74%. This indicates that DFSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSBJSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.74%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

1.63%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

2.44%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

2.88%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

2.88%

+2.58%

DFSB vs. JSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JSI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSB vs. JSI - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than JSI's 5.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
3.62%3.46%4.35%5.27%0.41%
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
5.81%5.80%6.16%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSB and JSI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSB has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to JSI (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs JSI's -2.31%.

On 1-year performance, JSI leads with 3.75% vs 3.35% for DFSB. On fees, DFSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JSI has performed better with a 3.75% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JSI.

JSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 3.62% for DFSB.

DFSB is categorized as Global Bonds, while JSI is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.50% for JSI.

JSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSB and JSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer