JSI vs. EVLN
JSI (Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF) and EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while EVLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JSI returned 2.95% vs 3.80% for EVLN. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JSI charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EVLN.
Performance
JSI vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSI achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than EVLN's 1.55% return.
JSI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.73%
EVLN
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.06M | $4.09M | $3.77M | |
| $4.88M | $5.15M | $6.51M |
JSI vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF | 1.23% | 6.46% | 6.71% |
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 1.55% | 5.59% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSI and EVLN is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSI vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank
JSI
EVLN
JSI vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSI | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 6.80 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSI vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSI drawdown since its inception was -2.31%, smaller than the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSI and EVLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSI | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -2.78% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.68% | -1.77% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.32% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -0.21% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.54% | -0.01% |
Volatility
JSI vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) have volatilities of 0.39% and 0.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSI | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41% | 1.87% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.85% | 2.38% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.85% | 2.38% | +0.47% |
JSI vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSI vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison
JSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than EVLN's 6.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 6.80% | 7.28% | 6.41% | 0.00% |
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF | 5.93% | 5.80% | 6.16% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSI and EVLN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVLN has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to JSI (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSI dropped -2.31% vs EVLN's -2.78%.
On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 3.80% vs 2.95% for JSI. On fees, JSI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 3.80% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.80%, compared with 5.93% for JSI.
JSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EVLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JSI and 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSI and EVLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer