JSI vs. BSJR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JSI (Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSI is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while BSJR is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. JSI is actively managed, while BSJR is passively managed. Over the past year, JSI returned 4.79% vs 5.05% for BSJR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JSI charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.

Performance

JSI vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSI achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than BSJR's 1.20% return.

JSI

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSJR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSI vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF	1.10%	6.46%	7.27%	3.39%
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.20%	7.41%	7.15%	4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JSI and BSJR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023	0.43

JSI vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JSI	BSJR
Technology	33.5%	1.6%
Financial Services	12.4%	13.8%
Communication Services	10.5%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	11.2%
Healthcare	9.5%	2.7%
Industrials	8.5%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	1.8%
Energy	4.0%	4.3%
Utilities	2.6%	0.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	4.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.6%

Return for Risk

JSI vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSI

JSI Risk / Return Rank: 59
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 69
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BSJR

BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 81
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSI vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JSI	BSJR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.39	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.71	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.48	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	4.37	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	20.22	-11.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JSI vs. BSJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the BSJR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSI and BSJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JSI	BSJR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.39	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.51	0.43	+2.07

Drawdowns

JSI vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSI drawdown since its inception was -2.31%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSI and BSJR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSI	BSJR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-22.58%	+20.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.68%	-1.16%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.18%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-3.25%	+2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.25%	+0.26%

Volatility

JSI vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.60%. This indicates that JSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSI	BSJR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.60%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.52%	1.45%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	2.12%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	6.73%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.88%	9.37%	-6.49%

JSI vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

JSI vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison

JSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, which matches BSJR's 5.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.75%	6.19%	6.75%	6.48%	5.37%	4.49%	4.53%	1.20%
JSI Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF	5.80%	5.80%	6.16%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSI and BSJR in my portfolio?

JSI and BSJR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JSI or BSJR?

JSI has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to BSJR (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSI dropped -2.31% vs BSJR's -22.58%.

Which ETF is better, JSI or BSJR?

On 1-year performance, BSJR leads with 5.05% vs 4.79% for JSI. On fees, BSJR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JSI or BSJR?

Over the 1-year period, BSJR has performed better with a 5.05% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JSI or BSJR?

BSJR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JSI or BSJR?

JSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.

What is the main difference between JSI and BSJR?

JSI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BSJR is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JSI and 0.42% for BSJR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.