PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSB vs. JPIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSB vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than JPIB's 0.74% return.


DFSB

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
10Y*

JPIB

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.71%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
0.84%5.22%2.45%9.37%-0.77%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
0.74%8.19%3.48%8.68%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and JPIB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.75

The correlation between DFSB and JPIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSB vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB
DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIB
JPIB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSBJPIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

4.78

-0.30

DFSB vs. JPIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the JPIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and JPIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSBJPIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.46

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.82

+0.06

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum JPIB drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and JPIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSBJPIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-13.13%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-3.75%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

-3.75%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.12%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-1.93%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.07%

-0.10%

Volatility

DFSB vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) at 1.08%. This indicates that DFSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSBJPIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.08%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

3.00%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.53%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.11%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.44%

+1.02%

DFSB vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSB vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than JPIB's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
3.61%3.46%4.35%5.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
5.02%4.85%4.57%4.35%3.10%2.59%3.14%4.66%5.83%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSB and JPIB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSB has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to JPIB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs JPIB's -13.13%.

On 3-year performance, JPIB leads with 5.79% vs 4.79% for DFSB. On fees, DFSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 5.79% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.

JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 3.61% for DFSB.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.50% for JPIB.

JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSB and JPIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer