JPIB vs. BNDX
JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) and BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. JPIB is actively managed, while BNDX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPIB returned 2.87%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for BNDX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPIB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BNDX.
Performance
JPIB vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPIB achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.54% return.
JPIB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
JPIB vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 0.99% | 8.19% | 3.48% | 8.68% | -6.38% | 0.14% | 7.14% | 10.76% | -2.17% | 2.61% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.54% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPIB and BNDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, JPIB and BNDX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
JPIB vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPIB
BNDX
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Financial Services
JPIB
BNDX
Communication Services
JPIB
BNDX
Utilities
JPIB
BNDX
Energy
JPIB
BNDX
Consumer Cyclical
JPIB
BNDX
-
Healthcare
JPIB
BNDX
Technology
JPIB
BNDX
-
Basic Materials
JPIB
BNDX
-
Real Estate
JPIB
BNDX
Consumer Defensive
JPIB
BNDX
-
Industrials
JPIB
BNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPIB vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
JPIB
BNDX
JPIB vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPIB | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 0.53 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 0.77 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.62 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 1.78 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPIB | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.53 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.07 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.61 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
JPIB vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPIB drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum BNDX drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIB and BNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPIB | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -16.23% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -2.93% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.75% | -2.93% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.83% | -15.86% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -1.49% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -3.09% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 1.02% | +0.05% |
Volatility
JPIB vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) is 1.08%, while Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that JPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPIB | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.57% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 2.91% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 3.43% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 4.88% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 4.09% | +0.36% |
JPIB vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPIB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPIB vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
JPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than BNDX's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 5.01% | 4.85% | 4.57% | 4.35% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 3.14% | 4.66% | 5.83% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPIB and BNDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNDX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to JPIB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIB dropped -13.13% vs BNDX's -16.23%.
On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.87% vs 0.33% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.87% return vs 0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 4.49% for BNDX.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPIB and 0.07% for BNDX.
JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPIB and BNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer