PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. DFGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.55% return.


DGCB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFGBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.75%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
1.47%6.68%3.80%6.14%
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.55%3.13%5.37%0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DFGBX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.27

Over the past year, DGCB and DFGBX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGBX
DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGCBDFGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.90

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

5.14

+0.91

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DFGBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DFGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DFGBX drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DFGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBDFGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-9.63%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-1.38%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-0.93%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.50%

+0.38%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.47%. This indicates that DGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCBDFGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.47%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

1.32%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

1.89%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.81%

2.19%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

1.93%

+2.88%

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGCB vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than DFGBX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGBX
DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
3.42%2.91%4.69%3.61%1.63%0.73%0.03%2.30%4.74%0.89%1.16%1.72%
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
3.21%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGCB and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGCB has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to DFGBX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCB dropped -3.50% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.

DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCB and DFGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer