PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. GABF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCB vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -5.24% return.


DGCB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.40%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GABF

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-5.24%
6M
-2.61%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
1.43%6.68%3.80%6.14%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
-5.24%3.60%44.38%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and GABF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
GABF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCBGABFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

-0.06

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

0.04

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.00

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

-0.07

+2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

-0.16

+6.96

DGCB vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCBGABFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

-0.06

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.90

+0.59

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and GABF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBGABFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-20.86%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-17.16%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-9.89%

+9.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-4.85%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

7.23%

-6.36%

Volatility

DGCB vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) is 1.47%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that DGCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCBGABFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

3.89%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

13.02%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

17.26%

-13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

20.53%

-15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

20.53%

-15.71%

DGCB vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGCB vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than GABF's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
3.22%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
2.07%1.96%4.19%4.95%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGCB and GABF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABF has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to DGCB (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCB dropped -3.50% vs GABF's -20.86%.

On 1-year performance, DGCB leads with 6.15% vs -0.98% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGCB has performed better with a 6.15% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DGCB.

DGCB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.07% for GABF.

DGCB is categorized as Global Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DGCB and 0.10% for GABF.

DGCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCB and GABF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer