DFNV vs. XLKI
DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. DFNV is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.
Performance
DFNV vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLKI's 17.05% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKI
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNV vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 2.81% | 0.21% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 17.05% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and XLKI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.65 |
DFNV vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFNV
XLKI
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DFNV
XLKI
-
Healthcare
DFNV
XLKI
-
Communication Services
DFNV
XLKI
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFNV
XLKI
-
Industrials
DFNV
XLKI
-
Basic Materials
DFNV
-
XLKI
-
Consumer Defensive
DFNV
-
XLKI
-
Energy
DFNV
-
XLKI
-
Financial Services
DFNV
-
XLKI
Real Estate
DFNV
-
XLKI
-
Utilities
DFNV
-
XLKI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
XLKI
DFNV vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNV | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNV | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 2.16 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and XLKI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -10.24% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -1.35% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -1.61% | -7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | — | — |
Volatility
DFNV vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.67% | 16.23% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 16.23% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 16.23% | +3.50% |
DFNV vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNV vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than XLKI's 14.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.29% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNV and XLKI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.
They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.35% for XLKI.
Find the right allocation for DFNV and XLKI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer