DFNV vs. TTAC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while TTAC is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by TrimTabs. DFNV is passively managed, while TTAC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFNV returned 8.34%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for TTAC. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TTAC.

Performance

DFNV vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's 15.31% return.

DFNV

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 3.25%
• 6M: 13.45%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: 8.91%
• 3Y*: 18.30%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.69%

TTAC

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -1.36%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 15.31%
• 1Y: 20.70%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 11.12%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	$4.83K	$15.31K	$12.56K
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF	$1.01M	$1.13M	$1.15M

DFNV vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	5.19%	8.42%	31.93%	26.92%	-24.05%	18.51%	3.29%
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF	15.31%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-14.60%	30.66%	3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and TTAC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between DFNV and TTAC has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFNV vs. TTAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFNV	TTAC
Technology	60.9%	31.4%
Healthcare	16.2%	11.6%
Communication Services	12.0%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	11.8%
Industrials	1.9%	9.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.0%
Energy	-	2.6%
Financial Services	-	14.5%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DFNV vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFNV

DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 20
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TTAC

TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFNV vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFNV	TTAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.24	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.76	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.22	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.90	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.97	8.91	-7.94

DFNV vs. TTAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the TTAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and TTAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and TTAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFNV	TTAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-34.95%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	-7.17%	-14.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	-19.92%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-21.88%	-7.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-4.50%	+2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.36%	-4.95%	-4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	2.33%	+6.92%

Volatility

DFNV vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) at 4.80%. This indicates that DFNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFNV	TTAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	4.80%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.91%	13.60%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	16.82%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.93%	17.42%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	18.75%	+1.02%

DFNV vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNV vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TTAC's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	0.33%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF	0.54%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFNV and TTAC in my portfolio?

DFNV and TTAC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFNV or TTAC?

DFNV has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to TTAC (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs TTAC's -34.95%.

Which ETF is better, DFNV or TTAC?

On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 11.12% vs 8.34% for DFNV. On fees, TTAC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFNV or TTAC?

Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFNV or TTAC?

TTAC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFNV or TTAC?

TTAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.33% for DFNV.

What is the main difference between DFNV and TTAC?

DFNV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TTAC is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.59% for TTAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.