DFNV vs. TTAC
Compare and contrast key facts about TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC).
DFNV and TTAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFNV is a passively managed fund by TrimTabs that tracks the performance of the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2020. TTAC is an actively managed fund by TrimTabs. It was launched on Sep 28, 2016.
Performance
DFNV vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFNV vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -15.04% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 2.92% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | -0.10% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 2.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's -0.10% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -15.04%
- 6M
- -17.93%
- 1Y
- -2.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFNV vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
TTAC
DFNV vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNV | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.61 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | 0.98 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.13 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 1.01 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 4.45 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNV | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.61 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.69 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and TTAC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFNV vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than TTAC's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.44% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.63% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and TTAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -34.95% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -12.12% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -21.88% | -7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.92% | -4.31% | -14.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -5.07% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.45% | 2.75% | +4.70% |
Volatility
DFNV vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 6.40% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 12.07% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 19.81% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 17.00% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 18.77% | +0.87% |