PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNV vs. TTAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFNV vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFNV vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
-15.04%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%2.92%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
-0.10%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%2.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's -0.10% return.


DFNV

1D
2.55%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-15.04%
6M
-17.93%
1Y
-2.08%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

TTAC

1D
3.03%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFNV vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFNV vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNVTTACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.10

0.61

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

0.98

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.13

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.01

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.29

4.45

-4.73

DFNV vs. TTAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the TTAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and TTAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNVTTACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

0.61

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.61

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.69

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and TTAC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFNV vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than TTAC's 0.63% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.44%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.63%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and TTAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNVTTACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-34.95%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-12.12%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-21.88%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.92%

-4.31%

-14.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-5.07%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.45%

2.75%

+4.70%

Volatility

DFNV vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFNVTTACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

6.40%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.07%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

19.81%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

17.00%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

18.77%

+0.87%