DFNV vs. TTAI
DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while TTAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs. DFNV is passively managed, while TTAI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFNV returned 7.20%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for TTAI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for TTAI.
Performance
DFNV vs. TTAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than TTAI's 3.25% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -6.49%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAI
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
DFNV vs. TTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -4.71% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 3.29% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 3.25% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and TTAI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DFNV and TTAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFNV vs. TTAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFNV
TTAI
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DFNV
TTAI
Healthcare
DFNV
TTAI
Communication Services
DFNV
TTAI
Consumer Cyclical
DFNV
TTAI
Industrials
DFNV
TTAI
Basic Materials
DFNV
-
TTAI
Consumer Defensive
DFNV
-
TTAI
Energy
DFNV
-
TTAI
Financial Services
DFNV
-
TTAI
Real Estate
DFNV
-
TTAI
-
Utilities
DFNV
-
TTAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. TTAI — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
TTAI
DFNV vs. TTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFNV | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.10 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.71 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 2.45 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. TTAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum TTAI drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and TTAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -34.17% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -13.00% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -21.34% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -34.13% | +4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -3.36% | -7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -9.17% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.12% | 3.76% | +5.36% |
Volatility
DFNV vs. TTAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 7.72%, while TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | TTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 8.62% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 16.14% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 18.63% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 17.27% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 19.03% | +0.70% |
DFNV vs. TTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TTAI's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNV vs. TTAI - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than TTAI's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.46% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNV and TTAI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to DFNV (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs TTAI's -34.17%.
On 5-year performance, DFNV leads with 7.20% vs 1.71% for TTAI. On fees, TTAI is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNV has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TTAI is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.40% for DFNV.
DFNV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TTAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.61% for TTAI.
TTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFNV and TTAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer