DFNV vs. PTF
DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFNV returned 7.43%/yr vs 23.12%/yr for PTF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
DFNV vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 80.89% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 0.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 80.89%
- 6M
- 74.65%
- 1Y
- 112.49%
- 3Y*
- 44.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.12%
- 10Y*
- 27.55%
DFNV vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -4.61% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 3.29% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 80.89% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and PTF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFNV and PTF has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFNV vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFNV
PTF
Technology
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DFNV
PTF
Healthcare
DFNV
PTF
-
Communication Services
DFNV
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
DFNV
PTF
-
Industrials
DFNV
PTF
Basic Materials
DFNV
-
PTF
-
Consumer Defensive
DFNV
-
PTF
-
Energy
DFNV
-
PTF
Financial Services
DFNV
-
PTF
Real Estate
DFNV
-
PTF
-
Utilities
DFNV
-
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
PTF
DFNV vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFNV | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.42 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 6.29 | -6.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 23.94 | -23.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -55.38% | +25.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -17.99% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -36.11% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -44.88% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | 0.00% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -13.25% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.10% | 4.72% | +4.38% |
Volatility
DFNV vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 7.73%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 16.31% | -8.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 31.34% | -16.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 40.91% | -22.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 35.47% | -15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 33.25% | -13.51% |
DFNV vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNV vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.39% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNV and PTF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.31%) compared to DFNV (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.12% vs 7.43% for DFNV. On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.12% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
DFNV has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
DFNV is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTF is Momentum. DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.60% for PTF.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFNV and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer