DFNV vs. ASMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DFNV tracks the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFNV returned 7.73% vs 130.11% for ASMH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

DFNV vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 63.99% return.

DFNV

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 11.80%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 25.24%
• YTD: 63.99%
• 6M: 53.18%
• 1Y: 130.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	2.99%	18.83%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	63.99%	58.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and ASMH is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

DFNV vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV

DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 14
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFNV	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	3.36	-2.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	3.81	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.47	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	8.24	-7.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.87	21.26	-20.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFNV vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFNV	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	3.36	-2.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	3.59	-3.06

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFNV	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-15.89%	-13.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	-15.89%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	0.00%	-3.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-4.33%	-5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.90%	6.14%	+2.76%

Volatility

DFNV vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 6.59%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFNV	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	13.84%	-7.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.86%	30.43%	-15.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.69%	38.94%	-21.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.66%	38.32%	-18.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	38.32%	-18.59%

DFNV vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNV vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ASMH's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	0.99%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	0.37%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFNV and ASMH in my portfolio?

DFNV and ASMH have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFNV or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to DFNV (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, DFNV or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 130.11% vs 7.73% for DFNV. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFNV or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 130.11% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFNV or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFNV or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.

What is the main difference between DFNV and ASMH?

DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.