PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNV vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNV vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 45.86% return.


DFNV

1D
-0.10%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-4.71%
6M
-6.49%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

IDGT

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
45.86%
6M
44.45%
1Y
53.87%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
-4.71%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%3.29%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
45.86%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and IDGT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DFNV and IDGT has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFNV vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFNV
IDGT

Technology

60.9%
56.9%

Healthcare

16.2%

-

Communication Services

12.0%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%

-

Industrials

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DFNV
60.9%
IDGT
56.9%

Healthcare

DFNV
16.2%
IDGT

-

Communication Services

DFNV
12.0%
IDGT
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFNV
9.0%
IDGT

-

Industrials

DFNV
1.9%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

DFNV

-

IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

DFNV

-

IDGT

-

Energy

DFNV

-

IDGT

-

Financial Services

DFNV

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

DFNV

-

IDGT
35.5%

Utilities

DFNV

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNV vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNVIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

6.00

-6.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

17.17

-17.22

DFNV vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNVIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-77.95%

+48.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-9.02%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-23.74%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-35.83%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.09%

-6.71%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-19.88%

+10.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.12%

3.15%

+5.97%

Volatility

DFNV vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 7.72%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNVIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

9.03%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

17.61%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

21.41%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

23.35%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

23.32%

-3.59%

DFNV vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNV vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than IDGT's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.40%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.74%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNV and IDGT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to DFNV (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 11.98% vs 7.20% for DFNV. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.40% for DFNV.

DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNV and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer