PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. TDVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TDVG

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.47%
6M
9.09%
YTD
10.93%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.11M$3.07M$2.63M

DFND vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%2.97%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
10.93%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%26.20%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and TDVG is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and TDVG has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFND vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
TDVG

Technology

24.8%
27.4%

Financial Services

18.2%
19.3%

Industrials

17.1%
14.4%

Healthcare

10.7%
12.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
6.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.5%

Energy

1.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

0.8%
0.8%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
TDVG
27.4%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
TDVG
19.3%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
TDVG
14.4%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
TDVG
12.8%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
TDVG
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
TDVG
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
TDVG
6.7%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
TDVG
1.5%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
TDVG
4.5%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
TDVG
0.8%

Utilities

DFND

-

TDVG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFND vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDTDVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

DFND vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDTDVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

Volatility

DFND vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDTDVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

DFND vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.29%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.96%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and TDVG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.

They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.50% for TDVG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and TDVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer