DFLV vs. SCHV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DFLV (Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFLV is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFLV returned 18.22%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

DFLV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 16.63% return.

DFLV

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 13.99%
• YTD: 17.99%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHV

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 12.60%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	17.99%	15.90%	12.88%	12.31%	-0.94%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	16.63%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and SCHV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.96

The correlation between DFLV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFLV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFLV	SCHV
Financial Services	20.2%	18.6%
Technology	16.2%	22.5%
Energy	13.8%	6.4%
Healthcare	13.4%	10.9%
Industrials	13.0%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	6.6%
Basic Materials	6.8%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.3%
Communication Services	4.2%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.3%	3.9%
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

DFLV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV

DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 92
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFLV	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.20	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.14	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.39	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	3.62	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.63	14.40	+4.22

DFLV vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFLV	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.80%	-37.08%	+20.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-6.83%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.80%	-15.26%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.78%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-3.81%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.71%	-0.14%

Volatility

DFLV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is 3.15%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that DFLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFLV	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	4.06%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	8.83%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.45%	11.26%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.14%	14.55%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.14%	16.92%	-2.78%

DFLV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFLV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SCHV's 1.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	1.38%	1.61%	1.65%	1.72%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.78%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFLV and SCHV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DFLV and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFLV or SCHV?

SCHV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to DFLV (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, DFLV or SCHV?

On 3-year performance, DFLV leads with 18.22% vs 17.58% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DFLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFLV or SCHV?

Over the 3-year period, DFLV has performed better with a 18.22% return vs 17.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFLV or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFLV or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.38% for DFLV.

What is the main difference between DFLV and SCHV?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.04% for SCHV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.