PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 10.90% return.


DFIV

1D
-2.25%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
9.75%
6M
13.52%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
10Y*

VYM

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
9.75%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.90%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and VYM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.74

The correlation between DFIV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
VYM

Financial Services

32.4%
20.5%

Energy

16.4%
9.8%

Basic Materials

10.9%
3.5%

Industrials

9.6%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

4.9%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.1%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.5%

Technology

2.8%
17.7%

Utilities

2.5%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
VYM
20.5%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
VYM
9.8%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
VYM
3.5%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
VYM
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
VYM
6.7%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
VYM
8.1%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
VYM
3.5%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
VYM
17.7%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
VYM
5.7%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.78

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

14.19

-1.10

DFIV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.45

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.51

+0.40

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-56.98%

+31.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-6.69%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-14.46%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-1.82%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-7.19%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.78%

+0.72%

Volatility

DFIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.08%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.08%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

7.73%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

10.35%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

13.97%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.34%

+0.32%

DFIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VYM's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.60%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VYM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 18.37% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VYM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer