DFIV vs. VUG
DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. DFIV is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.03%/yr vs 24.49%/yr for VUG. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
DFIV vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.80% return.
DFIV
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
DFIV vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 9.75% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and VUG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between DFIV and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIV vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIV
VUG
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIV
VUG
Energy
DFIV
VUG
Basic Materials
DFIV
VUG
Industrials
DFIV
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
DFIV
VUG
Healthcare
DFIV
VUG
Consumer Defensive
DFIV
VUG
Communication Services
DFIV
VUG
Technology
DFIV
VUG
Utilities
DFIV
VUG
Real Estate
DFIV
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
VUG
DFIV vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 1.46 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 5.09 | +8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.48 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.61 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -50.68% | +25.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -16.53% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.72% | -22.85% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -4.83% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -7.09% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 4.72% | -2.22% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 4.14%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 5.17% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 12.68% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 16.26% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 22.27% | -5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 21.47% | -4.81% |
DFIV vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIV vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.60% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIV and VUG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DFIV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 24.49% vs 23.03% for DFIV. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 24.49% return vs 23.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.03% for VUG.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIV and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer