PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.80% return.


DFIV

1D
-2.25%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
9.75%
6M
13.52%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
-3.62%
1M
0.03%
YTD
5.80%
6M
4.57%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
17.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
9.75%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.80%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and VUG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.55

The correlation between DFIV and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
VUG

Financial Services

32.4%
4.3%

Energy

16.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

10.9%
0.6%

Industrials

9.6%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
12.2%

Healthcare

4.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
1.5%

Communication Services

4.2%
17.3%

Technology

2.8%
53.5%

Utilities

2.5%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
VUG
4.3%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
VUG
0.6%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
VUG
12.2%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
VUG
1.5%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
VUG
17.3%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
VUG
53.5%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

1.46

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

5.09

+8.00

DFIV vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.48

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.61

+0.30

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-50.68%

+25.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-16.53%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-22.85%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-4.83%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-7.09%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

4.72%

-2.22%

Volatility

DFIV vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 4.14%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

5.17%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

12.68%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

16.26%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

22.27%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

21.47%

-4.81%

DFIV vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.60%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIV and VUG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DFIV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 24.49% vs 23.03% for DFIV. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 24.49% return vs 23.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.03% for VUG.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer