PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.


DFIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.57%
YTD
11.54%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
11.54%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and EFAV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.83

The correlation between DFIV and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
EFAV

Financial Services

32.4%
19.9%

Energy

16.4%
8.2%

Basic Materials

10.9%
1.6%

Industrials

9.6%
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.2%

Healthcare

4.9%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.5%

Communication Services

4.2%
9.7%

Technology

2.8%
4.5%

Utilities

2.5%
9.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
EFAV
19.9%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
EFAV
8.2%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
EFAV
1.6%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
EFAV
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
EFAV
5.2%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
EFAV
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
EFAV
11.5%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
EFAV
9.7%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
EFAV
4.5%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
EFAV
9.1%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
EFAV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.17

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

1.46

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

4.10

+9.92

DFIV vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

0.92

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.53

+0.40

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-27.56%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-6.46%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-8.75%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-5.61%

+4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-4.77%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.30%

+0.19%

Volatility

DFIV vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.17%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

8.17%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

10.35%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

11.79%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

13.21%

+3.42%

DFIV vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.55%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIV and EFAV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIV has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 12.87% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.55% for DFIV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.20% for EFAV.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer