DFAU vs. DFLV
DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and DFLV (Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAU returned 20.07%/yr vs 18.38%/yr for DFLV. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFLV.
Performance
DFAU vs. DFLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than DFLV's 20.67% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.12%
DFLV
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.77M | $29.67M | $32.10M | |
| $27.72M | $29.04M | $30.65M |
DFAU vs. DFLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 12.63% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -2.40% |
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | 20.67% | 15.90% | 12.88% | 12.31% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and DFLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DFAU and DFLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAU vs. DFLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAU
DFLV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
DFAU
DFLV
Financial Services
DFAU
DFLV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAU
DFLV
Industrials
DFAU
DFLV
Communication Services
DFAU
DFLV
Healthcare
DFAU
DFLV
Consumer Defensive
DFAU
DFLV
Energy
DFAU
DFLV
Utilities
DFAU
DFLV
-
Basic Materials
DFAU
DFLV
Real Estate
DFAU
DFLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. DFLV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
DFLV
DFAU vs. DFLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAU | DFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.57 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 6.41 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 23.73 | -11.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. DFLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than DFLV's maximum drawdown of -16.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DFLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | DFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -16.80% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -5.48% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -16.80% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -2.96% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.48% | +0.52% |
Volatility
DFAU vs. DFLV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) at 2.37%. This indicates that DFAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | DFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 2.37% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 8.02% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 11.17% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 14.07% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 14.07% | +2.62% |
DFAU vs. DFLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAU vs. DFLV - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DFLV's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.72% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAU and DFLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAU has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to DFLV (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs DFLV's -16.80%.
On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 20.07% vs 18.38% for DFLV. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 18.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.
DFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.
DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFLV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.22% for DFLV.
DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAU and DFLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer