PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 9.53% return.


DFAI

1D
0.40%
1M
1.66%
6M
6.44%
YTD
12.47%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.29%

EFAV

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.16%
6M
5.55%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.41%
ALL TIME*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.51M$70.03M$61.85M
$49.00M$48.85M$45.04M

DFAI vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
12.47%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%13.86%5.34%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
9.53%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and EFAV is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.87

The correlation between DFAI and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFAI vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAI
EFAV

Financial Services

23.1%
19.7%

Industrials

19.1%
15.7%

Technology

11.1%
4.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
5.1%

Basic Materials

8.4%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
12.6%

Energy

5.8%
7.7%

Utilities

3.8%
9.0%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.9%

Financial Services

DFAI
23.1%
EFAV
19.7%

Industrials

DFAI
19.1%
EFAV
15.7%

Technology

DFAI
11.1%
EFAV
4.4%

Healthcare

DFAI
8.8%
EFAV
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAI
8.6%
EFAV
5.1%

Basic Materials

DFAI
8.4%
EFAV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFAI
6.4%
EFAV
12.6%

Energy

DFAI
5.8%
EFAV
7.7%

Utilities

DFAI
3.8%
EFAV
9.0%

Communication Services

DFAI
3.6%
EFAV
9.1%

Real Estate

DFAI
1.4%
EFAV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAI vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAIEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.37

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

5.52

+4.31

DFAI vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, roughly equal to the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAIEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-27.56%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-6.66%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-8.65%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-27.46%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.32%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-4.76%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.86%

-0.08%

Volatility

DFAI vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 2.77%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAIEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

2.77%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

8.84%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

10.60%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

11.88%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

13.04%

+2.65%

DFAI vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAI vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.29%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAI and EFAV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to EFAV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 5-year performance, DFAI leads with 10.24% vs 6.67% for EFAV. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAI has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.29% for DFAI.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.20% for EFAV.

DFAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer