DFAI vs. VXUS
DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. DFAI is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAI returned 10.16%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for VXUS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
DFAI vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 16.04% return.
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
DFAI vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 10.63% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | 13.86% | 5.34% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 16.04% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAI and VXUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DFAI and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAI vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAI
VXUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAI
VXUS
Industrials
DFAI
VXUS
Healthcare
DFAI
VXUS
Basic Materials
DFAI
VXUS
Technology
DFAI
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
DFAI
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
DFAI
VXUS
Energy
DFAI
VXUS
Communication Services
DFAI
VXUS
Utilities
DFAI
VXUS
Real Estate
DFAI
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAI vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAI
VXUS
DFAI vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 3.07 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 11.84 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAI vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -35.97% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -11.27% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -13.58% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -29.44% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -8.20% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.92% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DFAI vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) is 4.53%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that DFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAI | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 6.28% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 14.10% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 16.08% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 16.21% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 17.18% | -1.46% |
DFAI vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAI vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than VXUS's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.23% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.51% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFAI and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to DFAI (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, DFAI leads with 10.16% vs 9.22% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFAI has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAI has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFAI.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.23% for DFAI.
DFAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAI and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer