PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEUS vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEUS vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEUS having a 10.91% return and VO slightly lower at 10.55%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DEUS having a 11.31% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.60%.


DEUS

1D
0.73%
1M
2.26%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.97%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.31%

VO

1D
0.91%
1M
3.47%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.09%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEUS vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
10.91%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-9.16%20.20%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.55%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DEUS and VO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DEUS and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEUS vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEUS
VO

Industrials

17.6%
17.9%

Technology

15.5%
18.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.8%

Healthcare

11.4%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
4.8%

Utilities

7.3%
8.3%

Energy

5.5%
8.5%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

4.3%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.1%

Industrials

DEUS
17.6%
VO
17.9%

Technology

DEUS
15.5%
VO
18.6%

Financial Services

DEUS
12.1%
VO
12.8%

Healthcare

DEUS
11.4%
VO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DEUS
10.6%
VO
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEUS
7.5%
VO
4.8%

Utilities

DEUS
7.3%
VO
8.3%

Energy

DEUS
5.5%
VO
8.5%

Basic Materials

DEUS
4.5%
VO
4.2%

Real Estate

DEUS
4.3%
VO
5.4%

Communication Services

DEUS
3.8%
VO
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEUS vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEUS vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEUSVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.62

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.32

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.46

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.62

9.40

+1.22

DEUS vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEUS and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEUSVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.62

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.46

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.50

+0.13

Drawdowns

DEUS vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEUSVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-58.87%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-8.17%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-19.02%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-27.57%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

-39.37%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-7.86%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.14%

-0.34%

Volatility

DEUS vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEUSVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.95%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

9.23%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

12.33%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

17.59%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

18.95%

-0.97%

DEUS vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEUS vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.45%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%0.00%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DEUS and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to VO (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.60% vs 11.31% for DEUS. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.35% for VO.

DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.03% for VO.

DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEUS and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer