DEUS vs. VO
DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - DEUS tracks the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEUS returned 11.66%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEUS charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
DEUS vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DEUS having a 11.66% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.93%.
DEUS
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
VO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
DEUS vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 11.57% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | -11.18% | 26.31% | 8.81% | 28.80% | -9.16% | 20.20% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.36% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEUS and VO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DEUS and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEUS vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEUS
VO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
DEUS
VO
Industrials
DEUS
VO
Financial Services
DEUS
VO
Healthcare
DEUS
VO
Consumer Cyclical
DEUS
VO
Consumer Defensive
DEUS
VO
Utilities
DEUS
VO
Energy
DEUS
VO
Basic Materials
DEUS
VO
Real Estate
DEUS
VO
Communication Services
DEUS
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEUS vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
DEUS
VO
DEUS vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.18 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 8.21 | +2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEUS vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -58.87% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -8.17% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.69% | -19.02% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -27.57% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | -39.37% | -1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.29% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -7.85% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.16% | -0.36% |
Volatility
DEUS vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is 3.20%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that DEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 4.46% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.38% | 9.84% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 12.81% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 17.66% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 18.93% | -0.96% |
DEUS vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEUS vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DEUS and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VO has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to DEUS (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.93% vs 11.66% for DEUS. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.
DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.03% for VO.
DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEUS and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer