PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DDIV has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 10.11%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
0.39%
1M
3.93%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
10.11%
ALL TIME*
9.22%

FDL

1D
0.39%
1M
3.67%
6M
9.83%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$943.17K$544.16K$292.85K
$51.38M$49.50M$43.21M

DDIV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
14.18%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.62%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and FDL is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between DDIV and FDL has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DDIV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
FDL

Energy

26.5%
11.1%

Financial Services

22.8%
13.7%

Real Estate

15.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
24.3%

Industrials

6.8%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
4.4%

Utilities

5.4%
15.4%

Healthcare

4.0%
11.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.3%
11.2%

Technology

1.0%
4.3%

Energy

DDIV
26.5%
FDL
11.1%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.8%
FDL
13.7%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.5%
FDL

-

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.3%
FDL
24.3%

Industrials

DDIV
6.8%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.5%
FDL
4.4%

Utilities

DDIV
5.4%
FDL
15.4%

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
FDL
11.7%

Basic Materials

DDIV
2.9%
FDL
0.4%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.3%
FDL
11.2%

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
FDL
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDIV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

6.62

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

15.62

-7.04

DDIV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-65.93%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-4.27%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-12.24%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-16.46%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-41.40%

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.58%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-9.59%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.81%

+1.26%

Volatility

DDIV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 3.60%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.65%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

8.75%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

11.89%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

14.44%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

17.16%

+2.75%

DDIV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.52%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and FDL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to DDIV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.08% vs 10.11% for DDIV. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.52% for DDIV.

DDIV is categorized as Momentum, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer