PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.79%
1M
2.76%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBP

1D
0.13%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.58%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and PBP is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDDD

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDDD vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDDD vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDDDPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.94

0.35

+2.60

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-43.43%

+41.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.04%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-6.69%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

Volatility

DDDD vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

6.87%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

11.86%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.71%

13.66%

-3.95%

DDDD vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDDD
YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.14%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDDD and PBP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.14%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.29% for PBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer