PBP vs. SCHD
PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBP is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBP returned 7.18%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PBP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.18%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
PBP
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 16.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
PBP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.40% | 8.49% | 19.83% | 11.59% | -11.82% | 19.97% | -3.31% | 14.60% | -5.57% | 11.98% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBP and SCHD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PBP and SCHD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PBP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBP
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PBP
SCHD
Financial Services
PBP
SCHD
Communication Services
PBP
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PBP
SCHD
Healthcare
PBP
SCHD
Industrials
PBP
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PBP
SCHD
Energy
PBP
SCHD
Utilities
PBP
SCHD
Real Estate
PBP
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
PBP
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PBP
SCHD
PBP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.40 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 5.35 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 12.94 | +3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -33.37% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -4.61% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -16.13% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -16.85% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -33.37% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -2.47% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -3.31% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 1.90% | -0.90% |
Volatility
PBP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 2.37%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBP | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 3.58% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 7.73% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 11.07% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 14.36% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 16.71% | -3.04% |
PBP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.36%, more than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.36% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to PBP (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 7.18% for PBP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PBP.
PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.36%, compared with 3.30% for SCHD.
PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHD is Dividend. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.06% for SCHD.
PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBP and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer