PortfoliosLab logo
PBP vs. XYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PBP and XYLD is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PBP vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBP:

0.60

XYLD:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

PBP:

0.88

XYLD:

0.88

Omega Ratio

PBP:

1.16

XYLD:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

PBP:

0.54

XYLD:

0.53

Martin Ratio

PBP:

1.97

XYLD:

2.01

Ulcer Index

PBP:

4.23%

XYLD:

4.10%

Daily Std Dev

PBP:

15.71%

XYLD:

15.37%

Max Drawdown

PBP:

-43.43%

XYLD:

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

PBP:

-8.16%

XYLD:

-7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a -5.12% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's -4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 5.47%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.42% annualized return.


PBP

YTD

-5.12%

1M

-0.03%

6M

-2.10%

1Y

9.34%

3Y*

6.79%

5Y*

9.13%

10Y*

5.47%

XYLD

YTD

-4.27%

1M

0.91%

6M

-2.11%

1Y

9.04%

3Y*

6.52%

5Y*

9.28%

10Y*

6.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

PBP vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBP vs. XYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBP is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBP is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBP is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBP is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBP is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBP is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XYLD is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XYLD is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBP vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBP and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PBP vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, less than XYLD's 13.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
10.81%10.22%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.55%2.59%10.86%2.56%5.21%4.96%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.34%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.75%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%4.15%

Drawdowns

PBP vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and XYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PBP vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) have volatilities of 1.95% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...