DDDD vs. SCHD
DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDDD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. DDDD is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. DDDD charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DDDD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDDD
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 31.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $365.80K | $291.65K | $204.25K | |
| $806.58M | $724.91M | $690.35M |
DDDD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 8.50% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDDD and SCHD is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDDD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DDDD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
DDDD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDDD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDDD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDDD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -33.37% | +30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.97% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -3.29% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
DDDD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDDD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 11.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 14.39% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 16.73% | -6.14% |
DDDD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDDD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DDDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.12% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DDDD and SCHD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.53% for DDDD.
DDDD is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for DDDD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer