DDDD vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

DDDD vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDDD

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: 4.91%
• 1M: 72.80%
• YTD: 192.40%
• 6M: 186.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	5.08%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	226.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and AMDW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026	0.23

Return for Risk

DDDD vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDDD	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	4.83	-2.28

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDDD	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-34.64%	+32.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	0.00%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-14.66%	+14.06%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDDD	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.69%	81.56%	-71.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	81.56%	-71.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	81.56%	-71.87%

DDDD vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDDD and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

DDDD vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.98%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	28.98%	34.78%
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDDD and AMDW in my portfolio?

DDDD and AMDW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDDD or AMDW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDDD or AMDW?

DDDD and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDDD or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

What is the main difference between DDDD and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.