PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. YMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.53%
1M
3.50%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

YMAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.93%
6M
5.27%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$365.80K$291.65K$204.25K
$9.31M$11.31M$14.54M

DDDD vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and YMAX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDDD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDDD vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDDDYMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

DDDD vs. YMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and YMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDYMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-26.13%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-10.75%

+9.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-6.57%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

Volatility

DDDD vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDYMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

24.15%

-13.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.59%

23.51%

-12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

23.51%

-12.92%

DDDD vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison

DDDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than YMAX's 71.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDDD and YMAX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDDD is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDDD is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 71.74%, compared with 1.53% for DDDD.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 1.33% for YMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and YMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer