DDDD vs. QQA
DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDDD charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
DDDD vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDDD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDDD vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 5.08% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDDD and QQA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDDD vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
DDDD
QQA
DDDD vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDDD | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 1.18 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
DDDD vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDDD | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -19.73% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.10% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -2.44% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
DDDD vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDDD | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 12.59% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 18.27% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 18.27% | -8.58% |
DDDD vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDDD vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDDD and QQA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.29% for QQA.
Find the right allocation for DDDD and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer