PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.05%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and QQA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDDD

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDDD vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDDD vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDDDQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

1.18

+1.37

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-19.73%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.10%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-2.44%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

Volatility

DDDD vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

12.59%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.69%

18.27%

-8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

18.27%

-8.58%

DDDD vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%.


PositionTTM20252024
DDDD
YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDDD and QQA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.29% for QQA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer