DDDD vs. QQA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDDD charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

DDDD vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDDD

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -2.90%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -0.58%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 25.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	3.15%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and QQA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.29

Return for Risk

DDDD vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDDD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 63
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDDD vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDDD	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.81	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.35	—

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -2.90%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDDD	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-19.73%	+16.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-3.37%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-2.53%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDDD	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	14.00%	-4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.81%	18.60%	-8.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.81%	18.60%	-8.79%

DDDD vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDDD vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.82%	9.78%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDDD and QQA in my portfolio?

DDDD and QQA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDDD or QQA?

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDDD or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDDD or QQA?

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.82%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

What is the main difference between DDDD and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 0.29% for QQA.