PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.05%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDDD vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDDDIPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and IPDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

0.00%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

0.00%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Volatility

DDDD vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDIPDPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

0.00%

+9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.69%

0.00%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

0.00%

+9.69%

DDDD vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDDD nor IPDP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DDDD is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDDD is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

DDDD and IPDP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 1.52% for IPDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and IPDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer