DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for RQFI.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RQFI.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than RQFI.DE's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has underperformed RQFI.DE with an annualized return of 3.94%, while RQFI.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.34% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -21.96% | 7.77% | 24.32% | 37.46% | -24.88% | 16.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and RQFI.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2014 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DBX9.DE and RQFI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
RQFI.DE
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.91 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 15.55 | -11.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.23 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.01 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.24 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.31 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than RQFI.DE's maximum drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and RQFI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -51.79% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -5.82% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -27.48% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -41.44% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | -45.24% | -8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -11.80% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -27.06% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.21% | +6.70% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | RQFI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.89% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 10.42% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 15.40% | +10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 20.96% | +7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 21.82% | +3.60% |
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and RQFI.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and RQFI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer