DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and 9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both China Equities funds - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBX9.DE returned 15.94%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for 9W1A.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for 9W1A.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBX9.DE is traded in EUR, while 9W1A.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 9W1A.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than 9W1A.DE's -11.20% return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -11.20%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 15.56% | 10.03% | 37.71% | -16.44% | -13.64% | -18.19% |
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -11.20% | 16.00% | 22.66% | -16.84% | -23.06% | -17.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and 9W1A.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DBX9.DE and 9W1A.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
9W1A.DE
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBX9.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.00 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.97 | -0.13 | +6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | -0.27 | +15.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than 9W1A.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and 9W1A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -53.55% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -18.72% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.85% | -27.29% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -33.04% | +22.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -31.74% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 9.12% | -6.57% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.99%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9W1A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.93% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 14.61% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 19.87% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.23% | 29.10% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 29.10% | -4.58% |
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 9W1A.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX9.DE nor 9W1A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and 9W1A.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1A.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1A.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and 9W1A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer