9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE
9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) and AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds - 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped while AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1A.DE returned 9.79%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for AH50.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 9W1A.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AH50.DE.
Performance
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
9W1A.DE is traded in USD, while AH50.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AH50.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1A.DE achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 12.06% return.
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 6M
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 33.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -8.14% | 30.93% | 15.68% | -14.27% | -27.31% | -3.13% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 12.06% | 25.78% | 18.85% | -13.29% | -20.67% | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1A.DE and AH50.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between 9W1A.DE and AH50.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1A.DE
AH50.DE
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1A.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 4.14 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 12.41 | -11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1A.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.89 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.35 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than AH50.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1A.DE and AH50.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1A.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -50.56% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -8.14% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -25.63% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.57% | -9.24% | -15.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.22% | -20.94% | -9.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 2.72% | +5.67% |
Volatility
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) at 6.38%. This indicates that 9W1A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AH50.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1A.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 6.38% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 12.86% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 17.80% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 24.49% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 23.70% | +6.88% |
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1A.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AH50.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1A.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison
9W1A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1A.DE and AH50.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1A.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1A.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1A.DE and 0.65% for AH50.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1A.DE and AH50.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer