9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE
9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) and H4Z6.DE (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both China Equities funds - 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped while H4Z6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1A.DE returned 9.79%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for H4Z6.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 9W1A.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for H4Z6.DE.
Performance
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
9W1A.DE is traded in USD, while H4Z6.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the H4Z6.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1A.DE achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z6.DE's -7.60% return.
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -8.29%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -8.14% | 30.93% | 15.68% | -14.27% | -11.82% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.62% | 31.50% | 19.78% | -11.94% | -5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1A.DE and H4Z6.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between 9W1A.DE and H4Z6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1A.DE
H4Z6.DE
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1A.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.28 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1A.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.25 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.18 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than H4Z6.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1A.DE and H4Z6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1A.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -33.37% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -17.32% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -25.25% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.57% | -15.57% | -9.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.22% | -13.95% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 8.41% | -0.02% |
Volatility
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) have volatilities of 7.64% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1A.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 7.47% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 13.87% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 19.21% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 26.91% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 26.91% | +3.67% |
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1A.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z6.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1A.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1A.DE nor H4Z6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, 9W1A.DE and H4Z6.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, H4Z6.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4Z6.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while H4Z6.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1A.DE and 0.28% for H4Z6.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1A.DE and H4Z6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer