DBEM vs. STXE
DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBEM returned 20.50%/yr vs 24.25%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
DBEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.89% return.
DBEM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
STXE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 1Y
- 56.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $211.10K | $775.94K | $508.07K | |
| $408.52K | $564.14K | $567.10K |
DBEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 20.05% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 2.23% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.89% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEM and STXE is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DBEM and STXE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEM
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DBEM
STXE
Financial Services
DBEM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
DBEM
STXE
Industrials
DBEM
STXE
Communication Services
DBEM
STXE
Basic Materials
DBEM
STXE
Energy
DBEM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
DBEM
STXE
Healthcare
DBEM
STXE
Utilities
DBEM
STXE
Real Estate
DBEM
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
DBEM
STXE
DBEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.80 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 10.42 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.51% | -20.38% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -20.38% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -20.38% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -14.32% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -3.96% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 5.47% | -1.33% |
Volatility
DBEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is 8.57%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that DBEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 12.86% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.29% | 28.03% | -7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 29.88% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 20.16% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 20.16% | -2.59% |
DBEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than STXE's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.20% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.90% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DBEM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to DBEM (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 24.25% vs 20.50% for DBEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DBEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 20.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.90% for STXE.
DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer