PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXE vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 53.94% return, which is significantly higher than EMXC's 47.39% return.


STXE

1D
0.43%
1M
13.55%
YTD
53.94%
6M
57.48%
1Y
88.62%
3Y*
31.44%
5Y*
10Y*

EMXC

1D
0.70%
1M
12.05%
YTD
47.39%
6M
50.85%
1Y
80.79%
3Y*
30.52%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
53.94%34.23%2.09%12.38%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
47.39%35.14%2.68%10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between STXE and EMXC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.94

The correlation between STXE and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.60

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.14

5.64

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.88

21.69

+2.20

STXE vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXE Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXE and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.92%

-42.81%

+23.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-14.41%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-19.12%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-10.15%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

3.74%

-0.02%

Volatility

STXE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.76% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 12.87%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.76%

12.87%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

22.38%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.88%

24.42%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

18.17%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

20.13%

-1.37%

STXE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than EMXC's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.81%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.75%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, STXE and EMXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to EMXC (12.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -18.92% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 31.44% vs 30.52% for EMXC. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EMXC has been the lower-risk option at 12.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 31.44% return vs 30.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.75% for STXE.

STXE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.49% for EMXC.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 3.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXE and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer