STXE vs. KEMX
STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXE returned 23.32%/yr vs 23.72%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. STXE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
STXE vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than KEMX's 29.19% return.
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
KEMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 16.27%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 54.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $479.51K | $502.15K | $570.21K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
STXE vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 29.19% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 11.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXE and KEMX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between STXE and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXE vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXE
KEMX
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
STXE
KEMX
Financial Services
STXE
KEMX
Basic Materials
STXE
KEMX
Industrials
STXE
KEMX
Energy
STXE
KEMX
Communication Services
STXE
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
STXE
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
STXE
KEMX
Utilities
STXE
KEMX
Healthcare
STXE
KEMX
Real Estate
STXE
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXE vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
STXE
KEMX
STXE vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.37 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 10.68 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXE vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -38.80% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -16.11% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -19.62% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -12.07% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -8.82% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 5.07% | +0.32% |
Volatility
STXE vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) at 9.57%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXE | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 9.57% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 24.95% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 26.95% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 19.41% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 21.51% | -1.34% |
STXE vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXE vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than KEMX's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, STXE and KEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to KEMX (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 3-year performance, KEMX leads with 23.72% vs 23.32% for STXE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 23.72% return vs 23.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.
KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.
STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXE and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer