DBEF vs. SMH
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.22%/yr vs 35.39%/yr for SMH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
DBEF vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 62.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.22%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.39% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- 6M
- 49.61%
- YTD
- 62.19%
- 1Y
- 101.68%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- 36.35%
- 10Y*
- 35.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
DBEF vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 13.76% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 62.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and SMH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DBEF and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
SMH
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DBEF
SMH
-
Industrials
DBEF
SMH
-
Technology
DBEF
SMH
Healthcare
DBEF
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
SMH
-
Basic Materials
DBEF
SMH
-
Communication Services
DBEF
SMH
-
Utilities
DBEF
SMH
-
Energy
DBEF
SMH
-
Real Estate
DBEF
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
SMH
DBEF vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 6.09 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 20.14 | -7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -84.96% | +52.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -16.80% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -35.74% | +21.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -45.30% | +30.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -45.30% | +12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -12.68% | +11.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -40.92% | +36.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 5.07% | -2.82% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.65%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 16.00% | -12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 31.90% | -20.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 37.27% | -24.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 36.26% | -22.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 33.19% | -17.61% |
DBEF vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DBEF and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
DBEF vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.29% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and SMH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to DBEF (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 35.39% vs 12.22% for DBEF. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 35.39% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
DBEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and VanEck.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer