DBEF vs. RYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - DBEF tracks the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index while RYLD tracks the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEF returned 13.11%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for RYLD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

DBEF vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 8.33% return.

DBEF

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 24.51%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 7.45%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	10.25%	23.16%	13.40%	20.15%	-5.13%	19.60%	2.03%	8.29%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	8.33%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-13.03%	22.13%	-0.44%	8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and RYLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019	0.70

The correlation between DBEF and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEF	RYLD
Financial Services	24.6%	104.9%
Industrials	19.9%	17.5%
Healthcare	10.5%	16.5%
Technology	10.3%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	5.9%	4.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	2.5%
Energy	4.1%	6.2%
Utilities	3.9%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	6.2%

Return for Risk

DBEF vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF

DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 57
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBEF	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.03	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.86	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	3.43	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	13.86	-2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBEF vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEF	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.03	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.19	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.32	+0.23

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEF	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.46%	-41.53%	+9.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-6.29%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.62%	-19.05%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.95%	-21.33%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.19%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-8.84%	+4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.55%	+0.68%

Volatility

DBEF vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.02%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEF	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	2.02%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	7.60%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.37%	10.67%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.74%	14.03%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	17.20%	-1.41%

DBEF vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEF vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than RYLD's 11.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	5.03%	5.55%	1.29%	4.46%	15.85%	2.28%	2.41%	3.03%	3.22%	2.98%	2.55%	3.70%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.65%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEF and RYLD in my portfolio?

DBEF and RYLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBEF or RYLD?

DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to RYLD (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, DBEF or RYLD?

On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.11% vs 2.69% for RYLD. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEF or RYLD?

Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEF or RYLD?

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEF or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.65%, compared with 5.03% for DBEF.

What is the main difference between DBEF and RYLD?

DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.