PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 7.80% return.


DBEF

1D
1.24%
1M
0.05%
6M
10.88%
YTD
13.76%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
12.22%
ALL TIME*
10.36%

COWZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.45%
6M
6.28%
YTD
7.80%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
13.76%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
7.80%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and COWZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between DBEF and COWZ has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DBEF vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
COWZ

Financial Services

24.8%

-

Industrials

19.0%
8.4%

Technology

12.7%
22.9%

Healthcare

10.4%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
10.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
8.8%

Utilities

3.8%

-

Energy

3.3%
11.2%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

DBEF
24.8%
COWZ

-

Industrials

DBEF
19.0%
COWZ
8.4%

Technology

DBEF
12.7%
COWZ
22.9%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.4%
COWZ
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.4%
COWZ
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.7%
COWZ
10.6%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.8%
COWZ
4.0%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.4%
COWZ
8.8%

Utilities

DBEF
3.8%
COWZ

-

Energy

DBEF
3.3%
COWZ
11.2%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.7%
COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.03

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.22

8.49

+3.73

DBEF vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-38.63%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-5.95%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-22.00%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-22.00%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.26%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-4.78%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.12%

+0.13%

Volatility

DBEF vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.82%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

8.03%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

11.49%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

17.63%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

19.86%

-4.28%

DBEF vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than COWZ's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.92%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
2.29%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and COWZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to DBEF (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.77% vs 10.59% for COWZ. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.92% for COWZ.

DBEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.49% for COWZ.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer