DBAW vs. MIDE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) and MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBAW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while MIDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBAW returned 11.27%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for MIDE. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DBAW charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MIDE.

Performance

DBAW vs. MIDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBAW having a 15.50% return and MIDE slightly higher at 16.15%.

DBAW

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 9.89%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 1Y: 31.91%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 11.27%
• 10Y*: 10.99%
• ALL TIME*: 9.39%

MIDE

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 0.72%
• 6M: 10.72%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 26.71%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	$1.39M	$1.84M	$1.16M
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	$7.19K	$26.37K	$22.11K

DBAW vs. MIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	15.50%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	6.43%
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	16.15%	9.81%	11.21%	15.20%	-11.63%	11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and MIDE is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.75

The correlation between DBAW and MIDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBAW vs. MIDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBAW	MIDE
Financial Services	23.9%	16.6%
Technology	23.5%	13.7%
Industrials	13.9%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	10.7%
Healthcare	6.9%	9.7%
Basic Materials	6.3%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	1.1%
Energy	4.4%	6.0%
Utilities	3.0%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.3%	9.1%

Return for Risk

DBAW vs. MIDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 87
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MIDE

MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 73
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBAW vs. MIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBAW	MIDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.70	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.48	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.30	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	2.87	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	10.31	+2.77

DBAW vs. MIDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MIDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and MIDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. MIDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, which is greater than MIDE's maximum drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and MIDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBAW	MIDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.44%	-24.59%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-9.36%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.11%	-24.59%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-24.59%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-0.53%	-2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-6.33%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.60%	-0.15%

Volatility

DBAW vs. MIDE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) at 3.48%. This indicates that DBAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBAW	MIDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.48%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	11.54%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	15.78%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	19.62%	-5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	19.51%	-4.29%

DBAW vs. MIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than MIDE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBAW vs. MIDE - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than MIDE's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	1.70%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF	1.25%	1.52%	1.45%	1.36%	1.33%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBAW and MIDE in my portfolio?

DBAW and MIDE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBAW or MIDE?

DBAW has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to MIDE (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs MIDE's -24.59%.

Which ETF is better, DBAW or MIDE?

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.27% vs 8.91% for MIDE. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBAW or MIDE?

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBAW or MIDE?

MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBAW or MIDE?

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.25% for MIDE.

What is the main difference between DBAW and MIDE?

DBAW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MIDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.15% for MIDE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.